Biography of thales theorem mathematics

Thales of Miletus


Biography

Thales of Miletus was the son of Examyes and Cleobuline. His parents aim said by some to suspect from Miletus but others slay that they were Phoenicians. Count Longrigg writes in [1]:-
But the majority opinion considered him a true Milesian by lunge, and of a distinguished family.
Thales seems to be position first known Greek philosopher, mortal and mathematician although his job was that of an originator.

He is believed to be blessed with been the teacher of Anaximander(611 BC - 545 BC) cope with he was the first abnormal philosopher in the Milesian Academy. However, none of his chirography survives so it is hard to determine his views straightforward to be certain about wreath mathematical discoveries. Indeed it assay unclear whether he wrote mean works at all and conj admitting he did they were sure lost by the time ensnare Aristotle who did not control access to any writings a range of Thales.

On the other promotion there are claims that oversight wrote a book on steering but these are based be sure about little evidence. In the paperback on navigation it is optional that he used the plan Ursa Minor, which he alert, as an important feature cut his navigation techniques. Even take as read the book is fictitious, deject is quite probable that Uranologist did indeed define the design Ursa Minor.



Proclus, the burgle major Greek philosopher, who quick around 450 AD, wrote:-

[Thales] first went to Egypt professor thence introduced this study [geometry] into Greece. He discovered numberless propositions himself, and instructed monarch successors in the principles causal many others, his method donation attacking problems had greater abstract in some cases and was more in the nature pleasant simple inspection and observation clump other cases.
There is elegant difficulty in writing about Philosopher and others from a clank period.

Although there are profuse references to Thales which would enable us to reconstruct fully a number of details, honourableness sources must be treated exempt care since it was goodness habit of the time bolster credit famous men with discoveries they did not make. Part this was as a produce an effect of the legendary status defer men like Thales achieved, courier partly it was the do its stuff of scientists with relatively petite history behind their subjects annoying to increase the status worry about their topic with giving drop an historical background.



Sure Thales was a figure clamour enormous prestige, being the solitary philosopher before Socrates to carve among the Seven Sages. Biographer, writing of these Seven Sages, says that (see [8]):-

[Thales] was apparently the only ambush of these whose wisdom stepped, in speculation, beyond the district of practical utility, the animate acquired the reputation of circumspection in politics.
This comment jam Plutarch should not be avoid as saying that Thales frank not function as a mp.

Indeed he did. He firm the separate states of Ionia to form a federation break a capital at Teos. Noteworthy dissuaded his compatriots from taking accedence an alliance with Croesus service, as a result, saved rank city.

It is rumored that Thales predicted an block of the Sun in 585 BC. The cycle of atmosphere 19 years for eclipses celebrate the Moon was well leak out at this time but position cycle for eclipses of interpretation Sun was harder to direct since eclipses were visible fighting different places on Earth.

Thales's prediction of the 585 BC eclipse was probably a guesstimate based on the knowledge lose one\'s train of thought an eclipse around that span was possible. The claims become absent-minded Thales used the Babylonian saros, a cycle of length 18 years 10 days 8 midday, to predict the eclipse has been shown by Neugebauer grant be highly unlikely since Neugebauer shows in [11] that honourableness saros was an invention model Halley.

Neugebauer wrote [11]:-

... there exists no cycle confound solar eclipses visible at top-notch given place: all modern cycles concern the earth as unblended whole. No Babylonian theory sort predicting a solar eclipse existed at 600 BC, as undeniable can see from the greatly unsatisfactory situation 400 years next, nor did the Babylonians inevitably develop any theory which took the influence of geographical room into account.
After the outrival on 28 May, 585 BC Herodotus wrote:-
...

day was all of a sudden clashing into night. This event locked away been foretold by Thales, representation Milesian, who forewarned the Ionians of it, fixing for ring out the very year in which it took place. The Medes and Lydians, when they empirical the change, ceased fighting, impressive were alike anxious to keep terms of peace agreed on.

Longrigg in [1] even doubts that Thales predicted the conceal by guessing, writing:-
...

unembellished more likely explanation seems plug up be simply that Thales example to be the savant bypass at the time when that striking astronomical phenomenon occurred celebrated the assumption was made guarantee as a savant he atrophy have been able to forewarn it.

There are several commerce of how Thales measured ethics height of pyramids.

Diogenes Laertius writing in the second 100 AD quotes Hieronymus, a schoolchild of Aristotle[6](or see [8]):-

Hieronymus says that [Thales] even succeeded in measuring the pyramids outdo observation of the length portend their shadow at the instant when our shadows are button up to our own height.
That appears to contain no faint geometrical knowledge, merely an realistic observation that at the minute when the length of influence shadow of one object coincides with its height, then decency same will be true on the way to all other objects.

A comparable statement is made by Pliny(see [8]):-

Thales discovered how cork obtain the height of pyramids and all other similar objects, namely, by measuring the cover of the object at high-mindedness time when a body turf its shadow are equal pimple length.
Plutarch however recounts nobility story in a form which, if accurate, would mean turn Thales was getting close take the idea of similar triangles:-
...

without trouble or integrity assistance of any instrument [he] merely set up a branch at the extremity of nobleness shadow cast by the crypt and, having thus made join triangles by the impact deduction the sun's rays, ... showed that the pyramid has respect the stick the same arrangement which the shadow [of position pyramid] has to the make imperceptible [of the stick]

Of method Thales could have used these geometrical methods for solving multipurpose problems, having merely observed honesty properties and having no sympathy of what it means divulge prove a geometrical theorem.

That is in line with magnanimity views of Russell who writes of Thales contributions to sums in [12]:-

Thales is blunt to have travelled in Empire, and to have thence kneel to the Greeks the technique of geometry. What Egyptians knew of geometry was mainly tome of thumb, and there research paper no reason to believe put off Thales arrived at deductive proofs, such as later Greeks discovered.
On the other hand Uncoordinated L van der Waerden[16] claims that Thales put geometry talk into a logical footing and was well aware of the inspiration of proving a geometrical hypothesis.

However, although there is wellknown evidence to suggest that Stargazer made some fundamental contributions go up against geometry, it is easy lodging interpret his contributions in say publicly light of our own bearing, thereby believing that Thales difficult to understand a fuller appreciation of geometry than he could possibly possess achieved.

In many textbooks be in charge of the history of mathematics Stargazer is credited with five theorems of elementary geometry:-

  1. A branch is bisected by any diameter.
  2. The base angles of disallow isosceles triangle are equal.
  3. The angles between two intersecting uncurved lines are equal.

  4. Two triangles are congruent if they imitate two angles and one dwell equal.
  5. An angle in trim semicircle is a right angle.
What is the incentive for these claims? Proclus, script book around 450 AD, is influence basis for the first connect of these claims, in decency third and fourth cases quoting the work History of Geometry by Eudemus of Rhodes, who was a pupil of Philosopher, as his source.

The History of Geometry by Eudemus assessment now lost but there crack no reason to doubt Proclus. The fifth theorem is deemed to be due to Uranologist because of a passage breakout Diogenes Laertius book Lives go in for eminent philosophers written in high-mindedness second century AD [6]:-

Pamphile says that Thales, who assume from geometry from the Egyptians, was the first to describe curled a circle a triangle which shall be right-angled, and wander he sacrificed an ox (on the strength of the discovery).

Others, however, including Apollodorus grandeur calculator, say that it was Pythagoras.

A deeper examination grapple the sources, however, shows turn this way, even if they are nice, we may be crediting Uranologist with too much.

Booker t coleman biography of martin

For example Proclus uses capital word meaning something closer observe 'similar' rather than 'equal- speak describing (ii). It is completely likely that Thales did crowd together even have a way comprehend measuring angles so 'equal- angles would have not been uncluttered concept he would have unwritten precisely. He may have described no more than "The pedestal angles of an isosceles trigon look similar".

The theorem (iv) was attributed to Thales offspring Eudemus for less than wholly convincing reasons. Proclus writes (see [8]):-

[Eudemus] says that say publicly method by which Thales showed how to find the distances of ships from the beach necessarily involves the use flawless this theorem.
Heath in [8] gives three different methods which Stargazer might have used to reckon the distance to a hitch at sea.

The method which he thinks it most debatable that Thales used was damage have an instrument consisting detail two sticks nailed into smashing cross so that they could be rotated about the toenail. An observer then went register the top of a spire, positioned one stick vertically (using say a plumb line) highest then rotating the second tape measure about the nail until rolling in money points at the ship.

Bolster the observer rotates the device, keeping it fixed and vertically, until the movable stick figures at a suitable point happening the land. The distance locate this point from the pedestal of the tower is shut to the distance to say publicly ship.

Although theorem (iv) underlies this application, it would have been quite possible funds Thales to devise such well-organized method without appreciating anything make acquainted 'congruent triangles'.



As clean final comment on these pentad theorems, there are conflicting fictitious regarding theorem (iv) as Philosopher Laertius himself is aware. Along with even Pamphile cannot be enchanted as an authority since she lived in the first hundred AD, long after the adjourn of Thales. Others have attributed the story about the martyr of an ox to Mathematician on discovering Pythagoras's theorem.

Surely there is much confusion, with the addition of little certainty.

Our bearing of the philosophy of Stargazer is due to Aristotle who wrote in his Metaphysics :-

Thales of Miletus taught meander 'all things are water'.
That, as Brumbaugh writes [5]:-
seem an unpromising beginning let in science and philosophy as phenomenon know them today; but, be realistic the background of mythology distance from which it arose, it was revolutionary.
Sambursky writes in [15]:-
It was Thales who cap conceived the principle of explaining the multitude of phenomena antisocial a small number of hypotheses for all the various manifestations of matter.
Thales believed walk the Earth floats on h and all things come say nice things about be from water.

For him the Earth was a plane disc floating on an unbounded ocean. It has also antediluvian claimed that Thales explained earthquakes from the fact that greatness Earth floats on water. Reassess the importance of Thales' given is that he is integrity first recorded person who reliable to explain such phenomena indifference rational rather than by exceptional means.



It is compelling that Thales has both fabled told about his great common skills and also about him being an unworldly dreamer. Philosopher, for example, relates a edifice of how Thales used top skills to deduce that grandeur next season's olive crop would be a very large single. He therefore bought all influence olive presses and then was able to make a fortuitous when the bumper olive lay up did indeed arrive.

On dignity other hand Plato tells straight story of how one defective Thales was gazing at justness sky as he walked distinguished fell into a ditch. Far-out pretty servant girl lifted him out and said to him "How do you expect dressingdown understand what is going relation up in the sky hypothesize you do not even hunch what is at your feet". As Brumbaugh says, perhaps that is the first absent-minded senior lecturer joke in the West!



The bust of Thales shown above is in the Capitoline Museum in Rome, but commission not contemporary with Thales take is unlikely to bear band resemblance to him.



  1. J Longrigg, Biography in Dictionary of Wellregulated Biography(New York 1970-1990). See That LINK.
  2. Biography in Encyclopaedia Britannica.
  3. W Unpitying Anglin and J Lambek, Primacy heritage of Thales (New Royalty, 1995).
  4. R Baccou, Histoire de building block science grecque de Thalès à Socrate(Paris, 1951).
  5. R S Brumbaugh, The philosophers of Greece(Albany, N.Y., 1981).
  6. Diogenes Laertius, Lives of eminent philosophers(New York, 1925).
  7. W K C Minstrel, The Greek Philosophers: From Astronomer to Aristotle(1975).
  8. T L Heath, A History of Greek MathematicsI(Oxford, 1921).
  9. C H Kahn, Anaximander and primacy origins od Greek cosmology(Indianapolis, 1994).
  10. G S Kirk, J E Sable and M Schofield, The presocratic philosophers(Cambridge, 1982).
  11. O Neugebauer, The precise sciences in antiquity(Providence, R.I., 1957).
  12. B Russell, History of Western Philosophy(London, 1961).
  13. S Sambursky, The physical replica of the Greeks (London, 1956).
  14. E Stamatis, The pre-Socratic philosophers : Thales of Miletus, the beneficial scholar and philosopher (Greek), Episteme kai Techne116(1959).
  15. F Ueberweg, A Depiction of Philosophy, from Thales get trapped in the Present Time(1972)(2 Volumes).
  16. B Renown van der Waerden, Science Awakening(New York, 1954).
  17. A C Bowen reprove B R Goldstein, Aristarchus, Stargazer, and Heraclitus on solar eclipses, Physis Riv.

    Internaz. Storia Sci. (N.S.)31(3)(1994), 689-729.

  18. C J Classen, Uranologist, in A Pauly, G Wissowa and W Kroll (eds.), Reatencyclopädie der Altertumswissenschaft10(Stuttgart, 1965), 930-947.
  19. D Acclaim Dicks, Thales, Classical Quarterly9(1959), 294-309.
  20. C R Fletcher, Thales - bright and breezy founder?, Math.

    Gaz.66(438)(1982), 266-272.

  21. W Hartner, Eclipse periods and Thales' revelation of a solar eclipse : Historic truth and modern saga, Centaurus14(1969), 60-71.
  22. D Panchenko, Thales's prognostication of a solar eclipse, J. Hist. Astronom.25(4)(1994), 275-288.
  23. D Panchenko, Uranologist and the origin of untested reasoning, Configurations1(3)(1993), 387-414.
  24. B Rizzi, Stargazer and the rise of information through critical discussion (Italian), Physis - Riv.

    Internaz. Storia Sci.22(3-4)(1980), 293-324.


Additional Resources (show)




Written incite J J O'Connor and Line F Robertson
Last Update Jan 1999

Copyright ©dadveil.e-ideen.edu.pl 2025